Re: [PATCH 3/4] reftable/stack: fix zero-sized allocation when there are no readers
From: Patrick Steinhardt <hidden>
Date: 2024-12-22 18:36:49
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 01:17:15PM -0500, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
On December 22, 2024 12:48 PM, I wrote:quoted
On December 21, 2024 1:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
To: rsbecker@nexbridge.com Cc: 'Patrick Steinhardt' <redacted>; git@vger.kernel.org; 'Randall S.Becker'quoted
quoted
[off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] reftable/stack: fix zero-sized allocation when there are no readers [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
Applying these on the author-supplied base (ff795a5c5e) yields the sametree asquoted
the result of merging my manual application of these four patches tops/reftable-quoted
alloc-failures into the same base.Ready to test this. Please let me know when and I will report results.If you want to start sooner $ git checkout -b test ff795a5c5ed2e2d07c688c217a615d89e3f5733b $ git am ... these four patches ... should give you the fix without anything else mixed in. I'll push out the usual four branches after integration testing, but it will be queued in 'seen' (just above the point that corresponds to 'next') first, before merging it to 'next' (and then down to 'master'before -rc1).quoted
FYI: 'seen' looks better now. I am having issues in t0211-trace2-perf.shwithquoted
undefined SSL symbols (SSL_get0_group_name), but am able to use git initagain. 'seen' looks good. Operator error on trace2-perf.sh - used the wrong version of OpenSSL.
Thanks for confirming! Patrick