Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 3 authors, 2024-11-27

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] bundle: support fsck message configuration

From: Patrick Steinhardt <hidden>
Date: 2024-11-27 05:45:04

On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 06:57:05PM -0600, Justin Tobler wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/bundle.c b/bundle.c
index 485033ea3f..4e53ddfca2 100644
--- a/bundle.c
+++ b/bundle.c
@@ -631,12 +631,12 @@ int unbundle(struct repository *r, struct bundle_header *header,
 	     struct unbundle_opts *opts)
 {
 	struct child_process ip = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
-	enum verify_bundle_flags flags = 0;
+	struct unbundle_opts opts_fallback = { 0 };
 
-	if (opts)
-		flags = opts->flags;
+	if (!opts)
+		opts = &opts_fallback;
Tiny nit: you could've introduced the fallback in the first commit
already. Like this you first introduce the code pattern and then change
it immediately in the subsequent commit.

Not worth a reroll though.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/bundle.h b/bundle.h
index 6a09cc7bfb..df17326b09 100644
--- a/bundle.h
+++ b/bundle.h
@@ -41,6 +41,13 @@ int verify_bundle(struct repository *r, struct bundle_header *header,
 
 struct unbundle_opts {
 	enum verify_bundle_flags flags;
+	/**
Nit: s|/**/|/*|

Again, not worth a reroll from my point of view, also with the recent
discussion at [ref] in mind where we basically went
"We don't care about them".

Patrick
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help