Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] maintenance: separate parallelism safe and unsafe tasks

Calvin Wan [off-list ref] writes:

.... I think for now it makes sense to hold off
on rerolling this series (at least in the form of auto
backgrounding/foregrounding tasks) since the purported benefits
currently aren't worth the churn. Thanks again for the comments on
this series

So, we'll place this topic on hold, or even eject from the tree to
be revisited later?

Thanks.