Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 5 authors, 2024-09-14

Re: Migration of git-scm.com to a static web site: ready for review/testing

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2024-09-11 22:18:53

Hi Todd,

On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
I found https://lychee.cli.rs/#/ in the meantime and figured out how to
use it in a local setup:
Nice.  That's much faster.
quoted
My most recent lychee run results in 0 broken links.

As a bonus, some of the links that are currently broken on
https://git-scm.com/ are fixed in https://git.github.io/git-scm.com/.
For example, following the `Pull Request Referləri` link at the top of
https://git-scm.com/book/az/v2/Appendix-C:-Git-%C6%8Fmrl%C9%99ri-Plumbing-%C6%8Fmrl%C9%99ri/
leads to a 404. But following it in
https://git.github.io/git-scm.com/book/az/v2/Appendix-C:-Git-%C6%8Fmrl%C9%99ri-Plumbing-%C6%8Fmrl%C9%99ri/
directs the browser to the correct URL:
https://git.github.io/git-scm.com/book/az/v2/GitHub-Bir-Layih%C9%99nin-Saxlan%C4%B1lmas%C4%B1/#_pr_refs

Another thing that is broken on https://git-scm.com/ are the footnotes in
the Czech translation of the ProGit book. These were broken in the Hugo
version, too, but now they are fixed. See e.g.
https://dscho.github.io/git-scm.com/book/cs/v2/Z%C3%A1klady-pr%C3%A1ce-se-syst%C3%A9mem-Git-Zobrazen%C3%AD-historie-reviz%C3%AD/#_footnotedef_7
and note that the Rails App redirects to
https://git-scm.com/book/cs/v2/Z%C3%A1klady-pr%C3%A1ce-se-syst%C3%A9mem-Git-Zobrazen%C3%AD-historie-reviz%C3%AD/ch00/_footnotedef_7
when clicking on the `[7]`, which 404s.

Could you double-check that the links in the current version?
Since I had it already, I ran linkchecker again.  It found
25 errors.  I'll attach the output, though I'm not sure if
the list will pass it along or not.

It looks like a number of errors are due to '?' characters
in the generated links, e.g.:

https://git.github.io/git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-What-is-Git?/
_That_ was quite a quest to investigate and to fix. The problem here is,
of course, the difference in how question marks are handled in file:// vs
https:// URLs: in the latter, they separate the path part from the query.
Therefore, they need to be URI-encoded in https:// URLs.

I verified manually (and with a Playwright-based test that is now run as
part of every deployment and of every PR build) that these URLs with
question marks in them work.

As to using `lychee` to verify the links, I went down quite a rabbit hole
to allow using it on the very same files that are being deployed, with
relative URLs and "ugly" ones at that, too (i.e. with the `.html` suffix
that you do not need to specify when accessing `.html` files on GitHub
Pages). This has not yet been released in an official version, therefore I
need to use the `nightly` version for the time being.

The good news is that the link checking is integrated into the deployment
and PR builds in https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/pull/1804. That will
allow us to catch broken links faster. One caveat, though: for robustness
(and also for speed), only internal links are checked. Links pointing to
other websites are not validated, but it is easy to do that manually by
running Lychee without the `--offline` flag.

Ciao,
Johannes
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help