Re: feature request: set remote/HEAD with fetch
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-17 05:09:55
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 09:55:00PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
quoted
I would propose that running `git fetch` should also update remote/HEAD. In case there is a possibility that it is useful in some cases that remote/HEAD is actually different from whatever is set in the remote repository as the default branch, I think a setting for opt-out would be better, and the default behaviour should be essentially always running `set-head -a`. My current workaround is an alias: fetchall = !git fetch --all && git remote | xargs -i git remote set-head -a {} which works for me, but I think it would be more elegant not to have to do this.I believe this would be a valuable change. I know a lot of other users want this features as well. However, I think it needs to be opt-in, since there are some cases where you want `git fetch` to specifically fetch only certain objects or don't want to modify the refs. For example, I know some server-side implementations use `git fetch` internally and require refs to be updated in a special way, and they would not appreciate extra refs appearing.
There was discussion a while ago that proposed a tri-state config option: never update the remote head on fetch, always do so, or add it only when missing: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20201118091219.3341585-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com/ (local) I think that is a good first step, as we could stop there and leave the default at "never" without any compatibility issues (and/or contemplate a change in the default as a separate step). I don't think the patch in that thread is likely to go anywhere at this point, but if somebody wanted to pick it up, I think everybody was positive on the general direction. -Peff