Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce cgit-rs, a Rust wrapper around libgit.a

Josh Steadmon [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

But just a dismissing "Bikeshed on the name", as if they do not care
to be mistaken as saying "those who complain about the name are only
bikeshedding and not worth listening to"?

We should do better than that.

I am quite surprised that people felt this was dismissive. So to be
clear: yes, we need a new name before this lands in next. I thought that
leaving that as a known needs-work item was sufficient to call that out,
but I guess I was wrong.

Yes, I had a similar initial reaction, but I guess that comes
primarily from the fact that we both misjudged how "cgit" is already
deeply established name that refers to something other than this
project.