[PATCH 2/5] t-reftable-readwrite: use free_names() instead of a for loop
From: Chandra Pratap <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-07 14:16:58
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
free_names() as defined by reftable/basics.{c,h} frees a NULL
terminated array of malloced strings along with the array itself.
Use this function instead of a for loop to free such an array.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref]
Mentored-by: Christian Couder [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <redacted>
---
t/unit-tests/t-reftable-readwrite.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-readwrite.c b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-readwrite.c
index 235e3d94c7..e90f2bf9de 100644
--- a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-readwrite.c
+++ b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-readwrite.c@@ -413,7 +413,6 @@ static void t_table_read_api(void) struct reftable_reader rd = { 0 }; struct reftable_block_source source = { 0 }; int err; - int i; struct reftable_log_record log = { 0 }; struct reftable_iterator it = { 0 };
@@ -432,10 +431,8 @@ static void t_table_read_api(void) check_int(err, ==, REFTABLE_API_ERROR); strbuf_release(&buf); - for (i = 0; i < N; i++) - reftable_free(names[i]); + free_names(names); reftable_iterator_destroy(&it); - reftable_free(names); reader_close(&rd); strbuf_release(&buf); }
@@ -498,9 +495,7 @@ static void t_table_read_write_seek(int index, int hash_id) reftable_iterator_destroy(&it); strbuf_release(&buf); - for (i = 0; i < N; i++) - reftable_free(names[i]); - reftable_free(names); + free_names(names); reader_close(&rd); }
--
2.45.GIT