Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] BreakingChanges: document upcoming change from "sha1" to "sha256"

Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] writes:

I agree that explicitly mentioning (1) and (3) is sensible. Is the
second one important though given that this is about the default when
creating _new_ repositories? I don't think interop code is a requirement
to make "sha256" the default, is it?

Let's drop (2) from the list, as I do not think there ever was a
concensus on it, and also for the sake of brevity.

Thanks.