On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 3:35 AM Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 01:31:03PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:

quoted

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 4:26 AM Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

In other words, this version is a minimum viable product for migrating a
repository's ref storage format. It works alright for bare repos, which
typically have neither worktrees nor reflogs.

Worktrees hanging off a bare repository is an explicitly supported
use-case, and there are people who use and promote such an
organization, so I'm not sure if "typically" is accurate these days.
Anyhow, just a minor observation, probably not worth rewording, and
certainly not worth a reroll.

True enough. I would claim that most bare repositories out in the wild
do not have worktrees, mostly because they are used on the server side.
But in the end, quantity is rather irrelevant. I'll s/typically/often/
to relax the statement a bit. Does that work for you?

Yes, "often" works just fine.