Re: [PATCH v2] push: don't fetch commit object when checking existence
From: Tom Hughes <hidden>
Date: 2024-05-22 21:46:25
On 22/05/2024 21:55, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Tom Hughes [off-list ref] writes:quoted
+test_expect_success 'push should not fetch new commit objects' ' + rm -rf server client && + test_create_repo server && + test_config -C server uploadpack.allowfilter 1 && + test_config -C server uploadpack.allowanysha1inwant 1 && + test_commit -C server server1 &&OK, we create the source that allows a partial clone.quoted
+ git clone --filter=blob:none "file://$(pwd)/server" client && + test_commit -C client client1 &&And make a clone out of it, without blobs.quoted
+ test_commit -C server server2 && + COMMIT=$(git -C server rev-parse server2) &&Then we create a new commit that the client does not yet have.quoted
+ test_must_fail git -C client push 2>err &&We try to overwrite it. We expect it to fail with "not a fast forward".
Well that is what it would fail with at the moment, but it's not what would happen with a non-partial clone - a non-partial clone would fail with "fetch first" instead. This patch makes both cases consistent although that wasn't the main driver - the main driver was to stop it fetching 100Mb or more of history in the large repository I was working with when the upstream has one new commit.
quoted
+ grep "fetch first" err &&May want to use "test_grep" but this script does not use it, so being consistent with the surrounding tests is good.
So here we are testing that it's a "fetch first" and rather than "not a fast forward".
quoted
+ git -C client rev-list --objects --missing=print "$COMMIT" >objects && + grep "^[?]$COMMIT" objects +'OK.
and also that it hasn't fetched the new commit. Tom -- Tom Hughes (tom@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/