On 30-03-2024 09:18, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:

On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:14:47AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:

quoted

On 22-03-2024 14:04, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 11:08:34AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:

quoted

(Sorry for initially sending this privately to Patrick.)

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 10:41 AM Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] wrote:

[snip]

quoted

quoted

I'd personally rather go with the latter, mostly because it matches our
git-scm.com domain. I also like it better than the current git-vcs/git
because of that.

So Chris, would you mind adding me (@pks-t, my non-GitLab handle) as an
additional owner of that group?

I'll empty out my gitscm group, make it private so that it won't be
accidentally used and transfer ownership to pks-t. You can then 'do what is
needed' with the group. Since gitlab doesn't support aliases (yet? :p) best
to park the namespace.

Olliver

By the way, thanks a ton for being this open and helpful during the
whole process. This is greatly appreciated!

Hey, no problem. I initiated this discussion because I wanted to get to 
this solution. Just because my mirror is not used doesn't mean I don't 
agree :)

Btw, I can't transfer the group, it's empty, but if I delete it _right 
now_, you'll have to re-create it, _right_now_ (well within the next 5 
minutes?).

Olliver

Patrick