Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 2 authors, 2024-03-15

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add transport message for up-to-date references

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2024-03-14 00:07:12

Christopher Lindee [off-list ref] writes:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add transport message for up-to-date references
Same comment as [1/2].  Perhaps

    push: mark forced no-op pushes differently in the report

or something?
quoted hunk
If the `--send-up-to-date` option in the previous commit is used, the
"Everything up-to-date!" message will never appear, even if all of the
refs are up to date.  Moreover, the output `deadbeef..deadbeef` appears
suspicious, almost as if a collision occurred.  To clarify that the hash
is, in fact, identical & to allow grepping for the phrase "up-to-date",
add a message to the output when the ref is transmitted, but no change
occurred.

Signed-off-by: Christopher Lindee <redacted>
---
 transport.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/transport.c b/transport.c
index 84deadd2b6..89802452ea 100644
--- a/transport.c
+++ b/transport.c
@@ -670,6 +670,8 @@ static void print_ok_ref_status(struct ref *ref,
 			strbuf_addstr(&quickref, "..");
 			type = ' ';
 			msg = NULL;
+			if (oideq(old_oid, new_oid))
+				msg = "up-to-date";
 		}
 		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, new_oid,
 					 DEFAULT_ABBREV);
This code is in an if/else cascade of this shape:

	if we are deleting
		print [deleted]
	else if they did not have any
		print [new]
	else {
		if we forced
		then
			prepare to say forced
		else
			prepare to say an unforced update
		say "updated" in a certain way
	}

The above addition looks somewhat out of place.  I would understand
if the addition happened like so instead:
diff --git i/transport.c w/transport.c
index df518ead70..bacef94b33 100644
--- i/transport.c
+++ w/transport.c
@@ -666,6 +666,8 @@ static void print_ok_ref_status(struct ref *ref,
 			strbuf_addstr(&quickref, "...");
 			type = '+';
 			msg = "forced update";
+		} else if (oideq(old_oid, new_oid)) {
+			... prepare to say "same but forced no-op" ...
 		} else {
 			strbuf_addstr(&quickref, "..");
 			type = ' ';

to make the new logic flow more like so:

		if we forced
		then
			prepare to say forced
		else if we were forced to tell no-op push
			prepare to say we did no-op
		else
			prepare to say an unforced update
		say "updated" in a certain way
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help