Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2024-03-02

Re: [PATCH] clean: improve -n and -f implementation and documentation

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2024-03-02 21:07:56

Sergey Organov [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Oh, sorry, I misinterpreted the patch. But yet, I'm not sure that
specifying that this is the default or not is really useful. If the
configuration was set to true, it is was a no-op. If set to false, no
message will appear.
I'm not sure either, and as it's not the topic of this particular patch,
I'd like to delegate the decision on the issue.
It is very much spot on the topic of simplifying and clarifying the
code to unify these remaining two messages into a single one.

And involving the --interactive that allows users a chance to
rethink and refrain from removing some to the equation would also be
worth doing in the same topic, even though it might not fit your
immediate agenda of crusade against --dry-run.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help