Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] trailer: prepare to expose functions as part of API
From: Linus Arver <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-29 23:53:06
From: Linus Arver <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-29 23:53:06
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Linus Arver [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
Nit: this patch and the next one will become commits, so perhaps: s/In the next patch/In a following commit/TBH I've always wondered whether "patch" or "commit" matters --- I've seen examples of patch series that referred to "commits" instead of "patches", and vice versa. I was hoping to hear an opinion on this, so I'm happy to see (and apply) your suggestion. Thanks.I think it is just fine to use either; sticking to one you pick consistently in the same series would have value. If you prefer commit, then fine. If you like patch, that's fine too.
Makes sense, thanks.