Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] add-patch: classify '@' as a synonym for 'HEAD'
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-12 21:45:28
Ghanshyam Thakkar [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
add-patch.c | 8 ------- builtin/checkout.c | 4 +++- builtin/reset.c | 4 +++- t/t2016-checkout-patch.sh | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- t/t2020-checkout-detach.sh | 12 ++++++++++ t/t2071-restore-patch.sh | 18 +++++++++------ t/t7105-reset-patch.sh | 15 ++++++++----- 7 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)diff --git a/add-patch.c b/add-patch.c index 79eda168eb..68f525b35c 100644 --- a/add-patch.c +++ b/add-patch.c@@ -1729,14 +1729,6 @@ int run_add_p(struct repository *r, enum add_p_mode mode, if (mode == ADD_P_STASH) s.mode = &patch_mode_stash; else if (mode == ADD_P_RESET) { - /* - * NEEDSWORK: Instead of comparing to the literal "HEAD", - * compare the commit objects instead so that other ways of - * saying the same thing (such as "@") are also handled - * appropriately. - * - * This applies to the cases below too. - */ if (!revision || !strcmp(revision, "HEAD")) s.mode = &patch_mode_reset_head; elsediff --git a/builtin/checkout.c b/builtin/checkout.c index a6e30931b5..067c251933 100644 --- a/builtin/checkout.c +++ b/builtin/checkout.c@@ -1224,7 +1224,9 @@ static void setup_new_branch_info_and_source_tree( struct tree **source_tree = &opts->source_tree; struct object_id branch_rev; - new_branch_info->name = xstrdup(arg); + /* treat '@' as a shortcut for 'HEAD' */ + new_branch_info->name = !strcmp(arg, "@") ? xstrdup("HEAD") : + xstrdup(arg); setup_branch_path(new_branch_info); if (!check_refname_format(new_branch_info->path, 0) &&diff --git a/builtin/reset.c b/builtin/reset.c index 8390bfe4c4..f0bf29a478 100644 --- a/builtin/reset.c +++ b/builtin/reset.c@@ -281,7 +281,9 @@ static void parse_args(struct pathspec *pathspec, verify_filename(prefix, argv[0], 1); } } - *rev_ret = rev; + + /* treat '@' as a shortcut for 'HEAD' */ + *rev_ret = !strcmp("@", rev) ? "HEAD" : rev; parse_pathspec(pathspec, 0, PATHSPEC_PREFER_FULL |
Nice. Things have become so much simpler, without having to touch millions of strcmp() with "HEAD" everywhere in the code paths. Will queue. Thanks.