Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 4 authors, 2024-02-24

Re: [PATCH] Add ideas for GSoC 2024

From: Patrick Steinhardt <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-09 06:27:51

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 07:32:50PM +0530, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:
Hi Patrick amd Christian,


On 6 February 2024 1:43:02 pm IST, Christian Couder [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 6:51 AM Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 12:25:31AM +0530, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:
quoted
I don't quite mind either way. I think overall we have enough tests that
can be converted even if both projects got picked up separately. And the
reftable unit tests are a bit more involved than the other tests given
that their coding style doesn't fit at all into the Git project. So it's
not like they can just be copied over, they definitely need some special
care.

Also, the technical complexity of the "reftable" backend is rather high,
which is another hurdle to take.

Which overall makes me lean more towards keeping this as a separate
project now that I think about it.
Makes sense.  I suppose we need to capture the distinction more
clearly in the ideas page.

I've tweaked the doc for the same. Do check it out and feel free to
suggest any corrections.

Ideas page: https://git.github.io/SoC-2024-Ideas/
Yeah, the clarification looks good to me. Thanks!

Patrick

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help