Re: [PATCH] Add ideas for GSoC 2024
From: Patrick Steinhardt <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-09 06:27:51
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 833 bytes
From: Patrick Steinhardt <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-09 06:27:51
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 07:32:50PM +0530, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:
Hi Patrick amd Christian, On 6 February 2024 1:43:02 pm IST, Christian Couder [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 6:51 AM Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 12:25:31AM +0530, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:quoted
I don't quite mind either way. I think overall we have enough tests that can be converted even if both projects got picked up separately. And the reftable unit tests are a bit more involved than the other tests given that their coding style doesn't fit at all into the Git project. So it's not like they can just be copied over, they definitely need some special care. Also, the technical complexity of the "reftable" backend is rather high, which is another hurdle to take. Which overall makes me lean more towards keeping this as a separate project now that I think about it.Makes sense. I suppose we need to capture the distinction more clearly in the ideas page. I've tweaked the doc for the same. Do check it out and feel free to suggest any corrections. Ideas page: https://git.github.io/SoC-2024-Ideas/
Yeah, the clarification looks good to me. Thanks! Patrick