Re: [DISCUSS] Introducing Rust into the Git project
From: Dragan Simic <hidden>
Date: 2024-01-24 05:14:17
Hello Elijah, On 2024-01-24 05:15, Elijah Newren wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 1:30 PM Dragan Simic [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 2024-01-11 17:57, Elijah Newren wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 9:39 PM Dragan Simic [off-list ref] wrote:and refrain myself from expressing my opinions in this thread....but that's not what my advice was. My advice was that you'd be more persuasive if you expressed your opinions differently. Some possible examples: * Stating that you are worried about the codebase becoming more complicated or more fragmented (without dismissing the points Taylor raised) * Arguing that you believe various points others raised aren't as much of an advantage as they perceive, or even potentially aren't even an advantage at all, not by mere assertion but by providing additional details on the topic (statistics, anecdotes, war stories, counter-examples, old commit messages, etc.) that back up your point * Stating that you don't understand why others think that advantages they state are as significant as they pose and ask for clarification. I think there's potentially some good points behind your positions, and I don't want to discourage them. I want to encourage lively, friendly debate so that we can have the best information possible when decisions are made.
Oh, I once again totally agree! I really love the way you expressed it, which I'm once again thankful for. I always support making improvements and major changes, introducing new technologies, augmenting or even replacing old technologies, etc. In the end, that's how progress is made, but such major changes also need to be performed very carefully, in a controlled way that provides a backup plan, and based on solid facts and past experiences. In this specific case, please be aware that my health wasn't in great shape, because I was (and still am) recovering from some nasty flu, which has also effectively diminished my mental capacities. That's the primary reason why I provided only terse comments, without backing them up with more specific details. That's not the way I usually operate, and I apologize for that.