Re: [PATCH 2/2] reftable/stack: fix race in up-to-date check
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2024-01-18 20:07:12
Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] writes:
This should address the race in a POSIX-compliant way. The only real downside is that this mechanism cannot be used on non-POSIX-compliant systems like Windows. But we at least have the second-level caching mechanism in place that compares contents of "files.list" with the currently loaded list of tables.
OK.
+ /* + * Cache stat information in case it provides a useful signal to us. + * According to POSIX, "The st_ino and st_dev fields taken together + * uniquely identify the file within the system." That being said, + * Windows is not POSIX compliant and we do not have these fields + * available. So the information we have there is insufficient to + * determine whether two file descriptors point to the same file. + * + * While we could fall back to using other signals like the file's + * mtime, those are not sufficient to avoid races. We thus refrain from + * using the stat cache on such systems and fall back to the secondary + * caching mechanism, which is to check whether contents of the file + * have changed.
OK.
+ * + * On other systems which are POSIX compliant we must keep the file + * descriptor open. This is to avoid a race condition where two + * processes access the reftable stack at the same point in time: + * + * 1. A reads the reftable stack and caches its stat info. + * + * 2. B updates the stack, appending a new table to "tables.list". + * This will both use a new inode and result in a different file + * size, thus invalidating A's cache in theory. + * + * 3. B decides to auto-compact the stack and merges two tables. The + * file size now matches what A has cached again. Furthermore, the + * filesystem may decide to recycle the inode number of the file + * we have replaced in (2) because it is not in use anymore. + * + * 4. A reloads the reftable stack. Neither the inode number nor the + * file size changed. If the timestamps did not change either then + * we think the cached copy of our stack is up-to-date. + * + * By keeping the file descriptor open the inode number cannot be + * recycled, mitigating the race. + */
This is nasty. Well diagnosed and fixed. Will queue. Thanks.