Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] doc: bisect: change plural paths to singular pathspec

Taylor Blau [off-list ref] writes:

On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 07:02:05PM -0900, Britton Leo Kerin wrote:

quoted

Britton Leo Kerin (2):
  doc: use singular form of repeatable path arg
  doc: refer to pathspec instead of path

 Documentation/git-bisect.txt | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Range-diff against v1:
1:  90c081dcab ! 1:  da40e4736b doc: use singular form of repeatable path arg
    @@ Commit message
         later document text mentions 'path' arguments, while it doesn't mention
         'paths'.

    -    Signed-off-by: Britton L Kerin [off-list ref]
    +    Signed-off-by: Britton Leo Kerin [off-list ref]

      ## Documentation/git-bisect.txt ##
     @@ Documentation/git-bisect.txt: The command takes various subcommands, and different options depending
-:  ---------- > 2:  d932b6d501 doc: refer to pathspec instead of path
--
2.43.0

Hmm. The end-state of these two patches looks good to me, but I probably
would have written this change as a single change from "paths" ->
"pathspec", not "paths" -> "path" -> "pathspec".

Have we seen a resolution to this comment?  I _think_ it is an OK
approach to take to do this in two steps, if the use of technical
term "pathspec" could be controversial, but since it is not, I am
fine with either one or two patches.  Since we already have the
two-patch version, let's take it.

Thanks.