Re: [GSoC][RFC] Replace use of atoi() with strtol_i(), as a microproject

[off-list ref] writes:

I am not sure this is a good idea. The error detection inside strtol_i() reports a -1 if the supplied text value is invalid. This does not differentiate between an invalid value and a valid "-1" supplied. Replacing all instances of atoi() with strtol_i() will likely cause breakages as the error semantics are different between the two.

atoi() and strtol_i() have totally different function signatures, so
it won't be a straight replacement.  The report of "-1" you mention
is only about strtol_i() reporting "have we successfully read out a
number [yes/no]?".  The value we parsed goes to a separate location,
so there is no risk of confusion as long as the caller knows what it
is doing.

Thanks.