Re: [PATCH 4/7] revision, rev-parse: factorize incompatibility messages about --exclude-hidden
From: Patrick Steinhardt <hidden>
Date: 2023-12-07 07:10:10
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 833 bytes
From: Patrick Steinhardt <hidden>
Date: 2023-12-07 07:10:10
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 02:25:01PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:07:29PM +0100, René Scharfe wrote:quoted
quoted
It's not perfect of course, but would at least ensure that we can easily convert things over time without having to duplicate the exact message everywhere.Maybe the simplest option would be to use a macro, e.g. #define INCOMPATIBLE_OPTIONS_MESSAGE \ _("options '%s' and '%s' cannot be used together") It could be used with both error() and die(), and the compiler would still ensure that two strings are passed along with it, but I don't know how to encode that requirement in the macro name somehow to make it self-documenting. Perhaps by getting the number two in there?I think that this is a great idea. It nicely solves Patrick's concern that we have to duplicate this message ID everywhere, and equally solves yours by calling error() inline instead of having to pass down the option values. I think that including a number in the macro name would be helpful here.
Does our i18n tooling know how to extract such messages defined in macros? I have to admit I don't really know how it works under the hood. But if it does work then this looks like a good solution to me. Patrick