Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2023-10-30
STALE966d

[PATCH 2/2] doc/git-repack: don't mention nonexistent "--unpacked" option

From: Patrick Steinhardt <hidden>
Date: 2023-10-16 07:20:01
Subsystem: documentation, the rest · Maintainers: Jonathan Corbet, Linus Torvalds

The documentation for geometric repacking mentions a "--unpacked" option
that supposedly changes how loose objects are rolled up. This option has
never existed, and the implied behaviour, namely to include all unpacked
objects into the resulting packfile, is in fact the default behaviour.

Correct the documentation to not mention this option.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <redacted>
---
 Documentation/git-repack.txt | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-repack.txt b/Documentation/git-repack.txt
index dfd2a59c50..d61078b697 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-repack.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-repack.txt
@@ -226,11 +226,8 @@ uniquely by the set of packs being "rolled-up"; in other words, the
 packs determined to need to be combined in order to restore a geometric
 progression.
 +
-When `--unpacked` is specified, loose objects are implicitly included in
-this "roll-up", without respect to their reachability. This is subject
-to change in the future. This option (implying a drastically different
-repack mode) is not guaranteed to work with all other combinations of
-option to `git repack`.
+Loose objects are implicitly included in this "roll-up", without respect to
+their reachability. This is subject to change in the future.
 +
 When writing a multi-pack bitmap, `git repack` selects the largest resulting
 pack as the preferred pack for object selection by the MIDX (see
-- 
2.42.0

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help