Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

Linus Arver [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

I could revert and discard [4-6/6] of the previous iteration out of
'next' and have only the first three (which I thought have been
adequately reviewed without remaining issues) graduate to 'master',
if it makes it easier to fix this update on top, but I'd rather not
to encourage people to form a habit of reverting changes out of
'next'.

Thanks.

I totally agree that reverting changes out of next is undesirable. I
will do a reroll on top of 'next' with only those incremental (new)
patches.

OK, so the first 3 patches are now in 'master', and the remainder of
the previous series have been discarded.

Thanks.

Oh, that simplifies things. I will re-roll on top of 'master' as the
starting point for the other remaining patches instead of using 'next'
as I suggested earlier.