Re: [PATCH] start_command: reset disposition of all signals in child

Phillip Wood [off-list ref] writes:

Oh I should have looked more carefully at the existing uses. It looks
like it is only my sequencer patch that does

	sigchain_push(SIGINT, SIG_IGN);
	sigchain_push(SIGQUIT, SIG_IGN);
	res = run_command(...);

Hmph, does it mean this patch would become unnecessary, once you fix
the above sequence to follow the pattern "to spawn and then ignore"?