Taylor Blau [off-list ref] writes:
So here we'd be doing the equivalent of
*v = RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF;
when trying to parse `--recurse-submodules=""`. Should this advice
instead say "[...] Use --no-recurse-submodules without an argument,
which does the same thing"?
Sounds right. So there is nothing to change here, I guess.
If --recurse-submodules="" does something people do not expect to
happen, an warning might be warranted, but I somehow do not think
that is the case here. If we are not hurting anybody by accepting
that (possibly unusual) form, I do not think we would want to add an
extra warning, either.
Thanks.