Re: [PATCH 1/3] scalar: add --[no-]src option
From: Derrick Stolee <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-14 19:21:31
On 8/14/2023 12:02 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
+--[no-]src:: + Specify if the repository should be created within a `src` directory + within `<enlistment>`. This is the default behavior, so use + `--no-src` to opt-out of the creation of the `src` directory.While there is nothing incorrect in the above per-se, and the first half of the description is perfectly good, but I find the latter half places too much stress on the existence of the "src" directory. As a mere mortal end-user, what is more important is not the presence of an extra directory, but the fact that everything I have is now moved one level down in the directory hierarchy to "src/" directory. This is the default behavior; use `--no-src` to place the root of the working tree of the repository directly at `<enlistment>`. or something along that line would have been easier to understand for me. It is not the creation of `src`, but that everything is moved into it, is what some users may find unusual.
Your confusion makes sense. Focusing on the location of the cloned repository is a good way to focus the option for the reader.
quoted
+test_expect_success '`scalar clone --no-src`' ' + scalar clone --src "file://$(pwd)/to-clone" with-src && + scalar clone --no-src "file://$(pwd)/to-clone" without-src && + + test_path_is_dir with-src/src && + test_path_is_missing without-src/src +'And another thing that may be interesting, from the above point of view, is to compare these two: (cd with-src/src && ls ?*) >with && (cd without && ls ?*) >without && test_cmp with without
Good idea. Thanks, -Stolee