Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] doc: revert: add discussion

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 04:10:55PM +0100, Phillip Wood wrote:

On 10/08/2023 23:00, Linus Arver wrote:

quoted

Linus Arver [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

How about
the following rewording?

     While git creates a basic commit message automatically, it is
     _strongly_ recommended to explain why the original commit is being
     reverted. In addition, repeatedly reverting the same commit will

Hmph, "repeatedly reverting the same commit" sounds wrong because
strictly speaking there is only 1 "same commit" (the original commit).

While it isn't strictly accurate I think that wording is easy enough to understand.

yes, but why would that be _better_ than saying "repeatedly reverting reversions" like i did?

regards