Thread (104 messages) 104 messages, 2 authors, 2023-10-02

Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] t/helper: add 'find-pack' test-tool

From: Christian Couder <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-08 18:03:02

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:44 AM Taylor Blau [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:59:03AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
quoted
---
 Makefile                  |  1 +
 t/helper/test-find-pack.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 t/helper/test-tool.c      |  1 +
 t/helper/test-tool.h      |  1 +
 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
 create mode 100645 t/helper/test-find-pack.c
Everything that you wrote here seems reasonable to me, and the
implementation of the new test tool is very straightforward.

I'm pretty sure that everything here is correct, and we'll implicitly
test the behavior of the new helper in following patches.

That said, I think that it might be prudent here to "test the tests" and
write a simple test script that exercises this test helper over a more
trivial case. There is definitely prior art for testing our helpers
directly in the t00?? tests.
Ok, I have written a new t0080-find-pack.sh test script for this in
the version 4 I just sent.

I have also changed `test-tool find-pack` so that it now accepts a
`--check-count <n>` option. This addresses some of your comments on
another patch in the previous version of this series. As the code is
now a bit more complex, there is more justification for a test script.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help