Re: SHA256 support not experimental, or?
From: brian m. carlson <hidden>
Date: 2023-06-29 01:59:39
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 263 bytes
From: brian m. carlson <hidden>
Date: 2023-06-29 01:59:39
On 2023-06-28 at 16:28:28, Adam Majer wrote:
Hi all, Is sha256 still considered experimental or can it be assumed to be stable? The usecase here is we are planning on moving to sha256 repositories mostly due to integrity guarantees, hypothetical or otherwise. What is important is not the initial interop challenges with sha1 repos, but whether the on-disk format will remain compatible with future versions of git. At minimum, the on-disk format would be converted by some future version(s) of git into another one and not be an end-of-the-road because it was "experimental" where dataloss is an implied risk.
I have no intention of changing things at this point. I think it should be viewed as stable by now, and I'd support this patch, although to get it picked up it will need a commit message and a sign-off. -- brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them) Toronto, Ontario, CA