On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 09:38:07AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Elijah Newren [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Anyway, your rebase of en/header-split-cache-h-part-3, including
Dscho's and Peff's changes, all look good to me.

Thanks everyone!

Thanks for confirming.  Let's merge it down to 'next' then.

I did a range-diff between en/header-split-cache-h-part-3{1} and the
current tip, and the changes look good to me. It might have been worth
mentioning the #ifndef changes in the commit message for e8cf8ef507
(setup: adopt shared init-db & clone code, 2023-05-16). But I see you
merged to 'next', and I don't think it's worth going back to change it
again.

It's nice when we can get everything in there, but I find that it's not
uncommon to sometimes dig extra details out of the list archive if I
don't understand part of a change when doing archaeology.

-Peff