Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:
A better way to spot that would be to start parsing the coccinelle logs,
and detect when we have unknown parsing issues, and error on those. But
until then...
Until then, I do not think a rather costly test that has found only
4 instances of the mistakes the test was designed to find is a good
way to stand in as a replacement.
Let's drop it, as it is easy to resurrect if somebody wants to run
it from time to time from an old version of Git. Or is it a valid
alternative to move it to "pending"?
Thanks.