RE: [PATCH] docs: document caveats of rev-list's object-name output
From: Baumann, Moritz <hidden>
Date: 2023-03-30 10:32:30
From: Baumann, Moritz <hidden>
Date: 2023-03-30 10:32:30
quoted
quoted
Those names are really just intended as hints for pack-objects. I suspect the documentation could be more clear about these limitations.That would indeed be great and would have likely prevented the obvious misconceptions on my side.Here's what I came up with.
Thanks, this is one half of what I would have needed to read.
I also considered adding a specific "if you want the names of each file in a range of commits, pipe to diff-tree" example. But it seemed like it would clutter up this section. It might be OK as a stand-alone in the EXAMPLES section, but should probably be done as a separate patch if anyone is interested.
That would be the other half. Since e.g. GitHub's own "best practice" examples do not use this pattern [0], I would assume that I'm not the only one who didn't know about it. [0] https://github.com/github/platform-samples/blob/master/pre-receive-hooks/block_file_extensions.sh