On Tue, Mar 28, 2023, at 15:23, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:

i thought about that already, and concluded that it's getting a bit "too
nerdy" and over-engineered.

I see that point too.

the main motivation for me is to break the dogmatism with which some
people are approaching the matter - "$tool did it, so it is _the_ way".
set an example where the tool does something "humane", and you may
change some minds.

Good thinking.

Your patch does something “humane” without adding any involved logic. A
good default for those who don’t want to change the provided revert
message. (Why? I would hope that they at least write something in the
body (after the subject) about why they are (reverting a
revert)/reapplying.)

-- 
Kristoffer Haugsbakk
Frequent reverter