On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 04:06:39AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:

On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 3:58 AM Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 02:54:45AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:

quoted

I am unable to reproduce any linting errors when running this script
through chainlint, which is why I was more than a little confused by
this patch when I read it, and I was just about to ask for more
information, such as the actual error message.

It's not your chain-lint script, but rather the builtin one that sticks
"(exit 117) &&" in front of the snippet and evals it. So it creates the
exact "foo && bar &" situation by prepending a line to the snippet.

Thanks for clarifying that. I failed to infer that from the commit message.

To be fair, I didn't figure it out from the commit either. It's just
that running it stand-alone was the first thing I happened to try. ;)

Yes, I can reproduce it now. My mistake was that I tested 'seen'
rather than 1f2e05f0b79, not realizing that Junio had already applied
Michael's patch. (I meant to check if it had been applied, but forgot
to do so.)

Oof. I got lucky twice, then, because I did run "seen" but I hadn't
fetched recently enough.

-Peff