Alex Henrie [off-list ref] writes:
[...]
quoted
quoted
so it seems fine to advertise them to users.
--no-rebase-merges is fine, but then you don't advertise it anyway.
I am not sure what you mean by this. The first patch of the series
adds documentation and a test for --no-rebase-merges, so I am
advertising it.
Ah, yes, you do it there, and that's fine with me.
I meant only the part where you suggest --rebase-merges instead of
--rebase-merges="". I have no nitpicks about any other parts of the
series.
Or are you saying that I /should/ advertise neither --no-rebase-merges
nor --rebase-merges without an argument, because you think
--rebase-merges=off and --rebase-merges=on would be better?
No, --no-rebase-merges is fine as far as I'm concerned.
Thanks,
-- Sergey