Re: Git over HTTP; have flexible SASL authentication
From: Matthew John Cheetham <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-01 19:36:40
On 2023-02-01 03:24, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 09:06:36AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
Rick van Rein [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Git providers are inventing proprietary extensions to HTTP authentication for Git. It seems smarter to use SASL for this purpose, possibly allowing the client a choice and authentication ringback to the client's own domain.To adopt things like this, the work to extend how to make extensible what is on WWW-Authenticate in the thread that contains this recent message https://lore.kernel.org/git/Y9LvFMzriAWUsS58@coredump.intra.peff.net/ (local) may be relevant, perhaps?It's relevant, but I think there's a ways to go. That is just about passing WWW-Authenticate headers to helpers, which can then try to make sense of them. But Git would still only understand getting back a username/password from the helper, and passing it along to curl. And hopefully we'd do it all through curl's SASL support, and not invent our own handling. I'm not sure what all that might might look like. I'm sure Matthew has probably thought about it, so I'll let him say something more intelligent. :) -Peff
These are the same thoughts I have on this. My patches only add support for the Git -> helper information flow, but don't make an attempt to change how helpers can change Git's (curl's) response or behaviour. I had earlier iterations [1] of the patch that included the ability to change the auth type/headers that curl would respond with based on the helper's output. For example: protocol=https host=example.com password=<TOKEN> authtype=bearer ..would have Git configure curl to set CURLOPT_XOAUTH2_BEARER. However I pulled these patches to keep the scope of that series smaller. It's still my plan to reintroduce such a patch series in the future. I'd imagine that Git could advertise to helpers that its version of curl supports SASL and a helper could enable or select this mechanism. Alternatively it could just be a Git config to enable it outright `credential.useSasl` or something. I haven't had chance to review SASL yet. Thanks, Matthew [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/230118.86k01kxfr7.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/T/#m37fffe327593ca4f7bf32a205b7ee1d1ecd1ed46 (local)