Re: [PATCH 3/3] scalar: only warn when background maintenance fails

From
Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date
2023-01-30 15:40:45
Derrick Stolee [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
Here, we are in an environment where background maintenance is
unavailable in an unexpected way. If that feature is not available
to the user, should they not get the benefits of the others?
That is not what I was saying.  I just have expected to see a way
for the user to give scalar an explicit "I understand that periodic
maintenance does not happen in this repository" consent, instead of
demoting an error detection for everybody to a warning that users
will just ignore.
Ah, so you'd prefer a --no-maintenance option for users who have
this problem instead of just a warning. I'll do that in v2.
Or a repository-local configuration to declare "no need to do the
maintenance stuff here", probably?  The expected use case you gave
does not match per-invocation command line option very well, right?
This could be a good time for me to upstream the --no-src option
while I'm messing with arguments in 'scalar clone'.
OK.  Thanks.
Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, last reply 2023-01-30
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help