Re: [PATCH] read-cache: avoid misaligned reads in index v4

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

I do find it a bit more straight-forward, but the extra copy is ugly,
plus the "yuck" comment.

Yeah, the "yuck" memcpy() is, eh, unfortunate.  Consistently using a
single "pointer" (pos) to keep track of where we are does make the
structure of the code appear uniform and easier to follow, though.