Re: Question relate to collaboration on git monorepo
From: Derrick Stolee <hidden>
Date: 2022-09-23 18:11:33
On 9/23/2022 11:46 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Derrick Stolee [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
This is an interesting find! I wonder how many people are hitting this in the wild. Perhaps merge.stat should be added to the optional, but recommended config options in scalar.c.Hmph. It somehow sounds like throwing the baby out with the bathwater, doesn't it. You are only interested in a few directories in the project. You pull from somebody else (or the central repository), and end up getting updates to both inside and outside the areas of your interest. As a project gets larger and better modularized, does it become more likely that such an update will happen more often? I am very tempted to suggest that the diffstat after a merge in such a project should use the sparse cone(s) as pathspec. Disabling the "what happened in this merge" report altogether is a way too blunt instrument, isn't it?
You're right that having a sparse-checkout-scoped diffstat is likely to be interesting in the long term. It does require updating its format to describe "some paths outside the sparse-checkout changed, but we won't give you the full diffstat there". Using something like the config to disable it in the short term would certainly hide the pain point, but you're right that we shouldn't stop there. Thanks, -Stolee