Re: [PATCH] mergetool(vimdiff): allow paths to contain spaces again
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2022-07-13 22:34:01
Fernando Ramos [off-list ref] writes:
On 22/07/13 02:54PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
OK, because "1" fails to execute, the expected output Dscho had (which is for the case without base) would become invalid when we use "true". Perhaps we should use "false" instead? Or do we need to test both?I think testing both is not really needed as the unit test is just making sure that filenames with spaces are processed correctly. Whatever comes before (which changes depending on the value of "base_present") doesn't really matter as long as there is something.
As the quoting glitch are distributed on both sides if $base_present then eval "$merge_tool_path" \ -f "$FINAL_CMD" "$LOCAL" "$BASE" "$REMOTE" "$MERGED" else # If there is no BASE (example: a merge conflict in a new file # with the same name created in both braches which didn't exist # before), close all BASE windows using vim's "quit" command FINAL_CMD=$(echo "$FINAL_CMD" | \ sed -e 's:2b:quit:g' -e 's:3b:2b:g' -e 's:4b:3b:g') eval "$merge_tool_path" \ -f "$FINAL_CMD" "$LOCAL" "$REMOTE" "$MERGED" fi I suspect you can fix only one, and carefully choose which side to test, and leave the other side broken ;-) In any case, to minimize disruption to Dscho's patch, I replaced the "1" with "false" (which will make his patch pass the new test without other stuff) and tweak its merge into 'seen' to adjust for the "leftabove" topic. Thanks.