Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 6 authors, 2022-07-11

Re: [PATCH] revision: mark blobs needed for resolve-undo as reachable

From: Taylor Blau <hidden>
Date: 2022-06-15 02:02:54
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:35:10AM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
I thinks I had something like

	for ((list) && item = (list)->items; (list) && item && ...
I wrote something like this:
--- >8 ---

diff --git a/string-list.h b/string-list.h
index d5a744e143..425abc55f4 100644
--- a/string-list.h
+++ b/string-list.h
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ int for_each_string_list(struct string_list *list,

 /** Iterate over each item, as a macro. */
 #define for_each_string_list_item(item,list)            \
-	for (item = (list)->items;                      \
+	for (item = (list) ? (list)->items : NULL;      \
 	     item && item < (list)->items + (list)->nr; \
 	     ++item)

--- 8< ---
but even with your suggestion, I get this compiler error:
...so did I. Though I'm not sure I understand the compiler's warning
here. Surely the thing being passed as list in the macro expansion
_won't_ always evaluate to non-NULL, will it?

Thanks,
Taylor
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help