Re: [RFC PATCH] git-prompt: make colourization consistent
flat view
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2022-06-01 14:49:42
On Wed, Jun 01 2022, Joakim Petersen wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The short upstream state indicator inherits the colour of the last short state indicator before it (if there is one), and the sparsity state indicator inherits this colour as well. Make the colourization of these state indicators consistent by clearing any colour before printing the short upstream state indicator, as this immediately follows the last coloured indicator. Signed-off-by: Joakim Petersen <redacted> --- As of 0ec7c23cdc6bde5af3039c59e21507adf7579a99, colourization of the output of __git_ps1 has changed such that the short upstream state indicator inherits the colour of the last short state indicator before it (if there is one), while before this change it was white/the default text colour. Some examples of what I mean are (assuming all indicators are enabled): * If the local tree is clean and there is something in the stash, both the '$' and the short upstream state indicator following it will be blue. * If the local tree has new, untracked files, both the '%' and the short upstream state indicator will be red. * If all local changes are added to the index and the stash is empty, both the '+' and the short upstream state indicator following it will be green. * If the local tree is clean and there is nothing in the stash, the short upstream state indicator will be white/${default text colour}. This appears to be an unintended side-effect of the change, and makes little sense semantically (e.g. why is it bad to be in sync with upstream when you have uncommitted local changes?). The cause of the change is that previously, the short upstream state indicator appeared immediately after the rebase/revert/bisect/merge state indicator, which is prepended with the clear colour code, while it now follows the sequence of colourized indicators, without any clearing of colour. However, adding a clearing of colour before the short upstream state indicator will change how the sparsity state indicator is colourized, as it currently inherits (and before the change referenced also inherited) the colour of the last short state indicator before it. Reading the commit message of the change that introduced the sparsity state indicator, it appears this colourization also was unintended. contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh index 87b2b916c0..dfd6cef35f 100644 --- a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh +++ b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ __git_ps1_colorize_gitstring () if [ -n "$u" ]; then u="$bad_color$u" fi + p="$c_clear$p" r="$c_clear$r" }base-commit: e54793a95afeea1e10de1e5ad7eab914e7416250
This seems to make sense to me, but I haven't looked deeply into it. But let's CC the author of 0ec7c23cdc6 (git-prompt: make upstream state indicator location consistent, 2022-02-27) (which I've done here). For a non-RFC patch I think a rephrasing of most of what yo uhave below "--" should be part of the message. Note how I referred to the 0ec... commit above, you should reference the commit like that (see SubmittingPatches). Thanks for working on this fix!