Philippe Blain [off-list ref] writes:
I can't really send an incremental fix because the final content
as it is in 'next' already is OK; it's just that some content which was added
in patch 2/5 should have been added in 1/5 instead.
It's that too big of a deal, I just wanted to let you know.
Ah, I mis-read you then.
Such a misdivision may technically break bisectability, but
hopefully nobody bisects the documentation changes and I do not
think we should be worried too much about it.
Thanks.