Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

I do not have hard data, either, except for one: apart from you and Junio,
I have yet to talk to any contributor who said "oh yeah, I found the logs
right away" rather than things like "when I finally figured out that the
logs were in `print-test-failures`, I had a chance to make sense of the
failures" or even "zOMG _that_ is where the logs are?". And let me tell
you that I heard this from a lot of people. Way more than a mere two.
Far, far more.

Stop counting me there.  I didn't find the logs right away, and I
already said that it is a good idea to eliminate the need to open
the thing other than the one that opens by default.