Re: [PATCH v2] test-lib.sh: Use GLIBC_TUNABLES instead of MALLOC_CHECK_ on glibc >= 2.34
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2022-03-03 22:12:22
Elia Pinto [off-list ref] writes:
Compared to the first version, the code has been simplified, based on Junio's indications, introducing some redundancy in the setting of the glibc variables covered by the patch
I think we can even lose the separate case statement and write its body inside if/then...fi. The following shows the result of shuffling the lines to do so.
setup_malloc_check () {
+ if _GLIBC_VERSION=$(getconf GNU_LIBC_VERSION 2>/dev/null) &&
+ _GLIBC_VERSION=${_GLIBC_VERSION#"glibc "} &&
+ expr 2.34 \<= "$_GLIBC_VERSION" >/dev/nullI am wondering if we want to make sure "getconf" returned a string that begins with "glibc " before stripping that prefix. Hopefully such a paranoia is probably unneeded.
+ then
+ g=
+ LD_PRELOAD="libc_malloc_debug.so.0"
+ for t in \
+ glibc.malloc.check=1 \
+ glibc.malloc.perturb=165
+ do
+ g="${g##:}:$t"Cute. As this strips a constant, we do not need to be ##greedy and using just a single # would suffice, right?
+ done
+ GLIBC_TUNABLES=$g
+ export LD_PRELOAD GLIBC_TUNABLES
+ ;;
+ fi
MALLOC_CHECK_=3 MALLOC_PERTURB_=165
export MALLOC_CHECK_ MALLOC_PERTURB_
}
teardown_malloc_check () {
unset MALLOC_CHECK_ MALLOC_PERTURB_
+ unset LD_PRELOAD GLIBC_TUNABLES
}
fiespecially the teardown side unsets these unconditionally.