"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref] writes:
+If the working tree for a a linked worktree is stored on a portable device
a a.
I've prepared the following to be squashed locally. I also have
another small one for 06/11.
Since 05/11-11/11 all share exactly the same subject, I am not sure
how well "git rebase -i --autosquash" would work, though. I suspect
it would so very poorly.
Subject: [PATCH] fixup! worktree: use 'worktree' over 'working tree'
---
Documentation/git-worktree.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-worktree.txt b/Documentation/git-worktree.txt
index 1243332d72..46afc7224f 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-worktree.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-worktree.txt
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ its associated administrative files, which reside in the repository
`git worktree prune` in the main or any linked worktree to clean up any
stale administrative files.
-If the working tree for a a linked worktree is stored on a portable device
+If the working tree for a linked worktree is stored on a portable device
or network share which is not always mounted, you can prevent its
administrative files from being pruned by issuing the `git worktree lock`
command, optionally specifying `--reason` to explain why the worktree is
--
2.35.1-273-ge6ebfd0e8c