Re: [PATCH] add usage-strings ci check and amend remaining usage strings
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2022-02-21 18:54:40
On Mon, Feb 21 2022, Abhradeep Chakraborty wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Sorry about leaving this patch submission hanging. I read this at the time, but forgot to find time to loop back to it.No worries. Thanks for reviewing :)quoted
But in this case there's really a much easier way to do this, to just extend something like this: ... See b6c2a0d45d4 (parse-options: make sure argh string does not have SP or _, 2014-03-23) for the existing code shown in the context where we already check "argh" like that, i.e. we're just missing a test for "help". Obviously such a function would need to hardcode some of the logic you added in your shellscript. E.g. this fires on a string ending in "...", but yours doesn't.Thank you so much for the suggestion. Didn't aware of it before. I will try to implement the logic in parse-options.c` (as you suggested).quoted
That should be fairly easy to do though, and if not we could always just dump these to stderr or something if a git_env_bool("GIT_TEST_PARSE_OPTIONS_DUMP_FIELD_HELP", 0) was true, and do the testing itself in t0012-help.sh.Okay but if the logic can't be implented in the `parse-options.c` file (most probably I will be able to implement the logic), would you allow me to try the `coccinelle script` method you mentioned?
In this case I think there's definitely no reason for why it can't/won't work in parse-options.c. If you're doing something like that with coccicheck I'm afraid I can't help much, I've only seen that the kernel is doing it (it's referenced in some of the coccinelle docs), but I haven't personally used it for anything close to that.