Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 4 authors, 2022-02-07

Re: [PATCH] receive-pack: purge temporary data if no command is ready to run

From: Jiang Xin <hidden>
Date: 2022-01-25 04:04:56

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:12 PM BoJun via GitGitGadget
[off-list ref] wrote:
-mk_empty () {
+mk_empty() {
That's wrong. We prefer a space between the function name and the
parentheses for shell script, see:

 * https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/CodingGuidelines#L138
        repo_name="$1"
        rm -fr "$repo_name" &&
-       mkdir "$repo_name" &&
-       (
-               cd "$repo_name" &&
-               git init &&
-               git config receive.denyCurrentBranch warn &&
-               mv .git/hooks .git/hooks-disabled
-       )
+               mkdir "$repo_name" &&
+               (
+                       cd "$repo_name" &&
+                               git init &&
+                               git config receive.denyCurrentBranch warn &&
+                               mv .git/hooks .git/hooks-disabled
+               )
The indent your made is ugly.
 }

-mk_test () {
+mk_test() {
        repo_name="$1"
        shift

        mk_empty "$repo_name" &&
-       (
-               for ref in "$@"
-               do
-                       git push "$repo_name" $the_first_commit:refs/$ref ||
-                       exit
-               done &&
-               cd "$repo_name" &&
-               for ref in "$@"
-               do
-                       echo "$the_first_commit" >expect &&
-                       git show-ref -s --verify refs/$ref >actual &&
-                       test_cmp expect actual ||
-                       exit
-               done &&
-               git fsck --full
-       )
+               (
+                       for ref in "$@"; do
Code style of the original is goold, yours is bad. See:

 * https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/CodingGuidelines#L100
+                               done &&
+                               git fsck --full
+               )
 }

 mk_test_with_hooks() {
This is the place you can fix by adding a space between the function
name and the parentheses.
+               (
+                       cd "$repo_name" &&
+                               mkdir .git/hooks &&
+                               cd .git/hooks &&
+                               cat >pre-receive <<-'EOF' &&
+                                       #!/bin/sh
+                                       cat - >>pre-receive.actual
Too deep indent. The original implementation is good, yours is bad.
-for head in HEAD @
-do
+for head in HEAD @; do
Bad coding style, please read through the "CodingGuidelines" for bash.

--
Jiang Xin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help