Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  [off-list ref] writes:

This is a follow-up to the recently landed ab/refs-errno-cleanup
topic, I missed a spot and left some meaningless use of "errno" in the
refs (file) backend.

Is it a fix "oops the ones we merged to 'master' were buggy and
needs these on top to be correct"?

If it is merely a follow-up "I am doing more of the same thing as we
aimed to do in that topic", I'd rather leave it to the next cycle.

I'll come back to the topic to find it out from the patches
themselves, but after I dealt with other patches that are more
clearly fix-ups first.

Thanks.