Phillip Wood [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
@@ -613,8 +622,8 @@ int cmd_name_rev(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
for_each_ref(name_ref, &data);
name_tips();
- if (transform_stdin) {
- char buffer[2048];
+ if (annotate_stdin) {
+ struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
I think this hunk belongs in the next patch. Before posting a patch
series I find it helpful to run
git rebase --keep-base -x'make -j4 git && cd t && prove -j4 <tests
I think might fail> :: --root=/dev/shm'
to check that the individual patches compile and pass the relevant
tests. I've never got round to trying it but git-test[1] also lets you
test all the commits in a series
Ahh, I saw and pointed out exactly the same mistake in an earlier
round, but failed to spot it this time around. Thanks for spotting.